Subject: Year 2000, wu-ftpd Version wu-2.4.2-academ[BETA-16]

From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 08:43:26 -0700

>From [email-masked] Mon May  4 08:30 PDT 1998
Date: Mon, 04 May 1998 11:16:43 -0400
Reply-To: [email-masked]
Sender: [email-masked]
>From: [email-masked] (PHETPHONE D CHANTHAVONG)
To: wu-ftpd
Subject: wu-ftpd Version wu-2.4.2-academ[BETA-16]
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-description: cc:Mail note part
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.0 -- ListProcessor(tm) by CREN
Status: R

[email-masked] (PHETPHONE D CHANTHAVONG) asks:

>      Could someone please tell me if the wu-ftpd Version 
>      wu-2.4.2-academ[beta-16] is supported the year 2K 
>      compliance?

The only Y2k issue that I have discovered in any recent wu-ftpd
version is one statement in ftpcmd.y.  Briefly:
    reply(213, "19%02d ...", t->tm_year, ...);
needs to be changed to something like
    reply(213, "%04d ...", t->tm_year + 1900, ...);

See my write-up of this in the current FAQ for more detail.

-- 
Roger Wells
Sr. Project Engineer, Network Usage Measurement
[email-masked]