Subject: Re: Compiling pine 4.4.5 on RedHat9/gcc 3.2.2 (fwd)

From: Ed Greshko <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 15:58:57 +0800

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Simon White wrote:

> > claims, and point out exactly how any such changes you can find
> > violate any Linux standard.
>
> Sorry?
>
> I didn't say that it violated a standard, merely that it had changed. A
> number of things break between major revisions of RedHat and other
> distros, this is to be expected. They are not even expected to be binary
> compatible. GCC versions change (RH is on GCC 3.x now, I believe)...
>
> However, with regard to Pine, this means that the configuration that is
> fixed in the build scripts for 7.x will probably not work with RH9.x...
> because RH9.x adheres more strictly TO standards, ironically.
>
> I don't see what was negative about my post nor why you took umbrage to
> it, I'm just trying to help the person who is unable to compile.

I've still not seen, probably missed it, where the compile errors have
been posted.

I've compiled pine 4.56 on RH9 just fine...

-- 
SARS - The only virus not spread by Outlook
http://www.shorewall.net/  for all your firewall needs

---

From: "Mike A. Harris" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 19:02:54 -0400 (EDT)

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Ed Greshko wrote:

>Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 15:58:57 +0800
>From: Ed Greshko <[email-masked]>
>To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email-masked]>
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>Subject: Re: Compiling pine 4.4.5 on RedHat9/gcc 3.2.2 (fwd)
>

I have as well, which is why I responded to his FUD mail.  ;o)

-- 
Mike A. Harris     ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris
OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat