Subject: Threads and empty subject lines in 4.55

From: Birl <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:01:33 -0400 (EDT)

Maybe this has been discussed already, Im too lazy to look.

My one folder is thread-sorted.  I reply to an email message that
contains no Subject line.  The FCC is the same folder as the message Im
replying to.

After the message is sent and FCC'd, there's no indication of a thread.
However using the / key shows my reply underneath the original.

Example:
-------

+   468 Jun 24 [email-masked]                     (639)
+   470 Jun 24 [email-masked]                     (720)

+ A 468 Jun 24 [email-masked]                     (639)
    469 Jun 24 To: [email-masked]                 (539)   |-Re: dinner?
+   470 Jun 24 [email-masked]                     (720)

========================================================================================

What I expect is something like this:
------------------------------------

    438 Jun 19 To: Mousy                             (1236) - Shape toys
+ A 439 Jun 19 Mousy                                 (1899) - |-Re: Shape toys
    440 Jun 19 To: Mousy                             (2041) -   |-Re: Shape toys
+   441 Jun 19 Mousy                                  (894)       |-discovery

Has this issue already been covered?
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: 
 http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

---

From: Birl <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:10:02 -0400 (EDT)

Allow me to clarify:

Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:01:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Birl <[email-masked]>
To: Pine Discussion Forum <[email-masked]>
Subject: Threads and empty subject lines in 4.55

Example:
-------

What I expect is something like this:   (note the - here    | which are
                                                            | absent above)
------------------------------------                        |
                                                            v

---

From: Steve Hubert <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 10:58:04 -0700 (PDT)

On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Birl wrote:

> [...]

No, it has not been covered. I've attached a patch relative to 4.56 source
code. The patched routine is the same in 4.55, so the patch should work
there as well. Thanks!

Steve Hubert <[email-masked]>
Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle