Subject: Re: Urgent flagging

From: Nancy McGough <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 11:04:05 +0000 (GMT)

On 29 Nov 2001 William R. Van Kuyk ([email-masked]) wrote:
> It looks great.... Check out the enclosed image
>
> And the link is NOT clickable

Thanks William! I've added info about X-Message-Flag to my main
Pine page here

 http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/#x-message-flag

and included a link to the graphic you sent. Let me know if you
want me to turn your name into a link, or remove your name.

Also, if anyone has any more info about this header, your use
of it, responses you've gotten from Outlook users, or suggestions
for the contents of it, please let me know so I can add the info
to my page.

Thanks!
Nancy

-- 
ii Main Pine Page: <http://www.ii.com/internet/messaging/pine/>

Nancy McGough           <http://www.ii.com/>           Infinite Ink
--= Sent via Pine 4.43: IMAP, NNTP & ESMTP for Unix/Win/MacOS X =--

---

From: Christopher Fisk <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 08:34:07 -0500 (EST)

Nancy, could you block out my e-mail address in that picture, I already 
get way too much e-mail. =)

Chris

---

From: Nancy McGough <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 14:11:35 +0000 (GMT)

> get way too much e-mail. =)

Oops, sorry. I just removed the image and, according to my logs,
hardly anyone looked at it so I hope it didn't generate any spam
for you.

I know almost nothing about creating and editing images so for
now I don't have an image out there but maybe someone will send
me another one with

* no email address showing other than my public address
  ([email-masked]).

* the current contents of my X-Message-Flag. It's a little
  different than it was and actually I'm still hoping to
  come up with something better so if anyone has suggestions,
  please let me know.

* small size so it doesn't take long for people to download and
  view it.

Thanks again for telling us about this great subversive header,
Chris!
Nancy

---

From: Christopher Fisk <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 10:02:12 -0500 (EST)

>hardly anyone looked at it so I hope it didn't generate any spam

Nah, I honestly didn't think I would get any spam from it (It's in image 
format so a web crawler can't read it) but it's just the idea of it =)

I can't help you with an image for this as I do not use outlook/outlook 
express.

I should really upgrade to 4.43 sometime today.

Chris

---

From: Stewart James <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 08:56:28 +1100 (EST)

Has anyone seen this working when the recipient is using OUtlook XP and an
IMAP server?

The person accross from me uses that configuration, but X-Message-Flag:
and X-Message: does not have the desired effect. Reply-By: does work as
the Anti Outlook Site mentions.

Stewart.