Subject: build against glibc 2.2.2

From: Ivan Zakharyaschev <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 19:40:50 +0300 (MSK)

Greetings!

I'd like know whether anyone has already built Pine against the last
glibc on Linux. Or is planning to do so in the nearest future. If yes --
could you send me the patches.

Probably they are going to be rather trivial (a few explicit "include"'s),
I just don't want the same work to be done twice. In fact, when compiling,
the first problems occur in the IMAP part of the sources.

A more global question that I always wanted to ask, but never did: is it
possible to compile Pine without having all the IMAP and c-client sources,
by including some header-files and linking against some imap or c-client
libraries? That would spare some time on building, the size of the tarball
with sources and perhaps the size of the binaries (if they are linked
dynamically against the c-client library and there are other programs in
the system that are based on the same c-client).  By the way, do you know
of any other such IMAP clients (I mean, based on c-client)?

Best regards,
	Ivan Z.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: 
 http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

---

From: "Mike A. Harris" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 12:15:21 -0500 (EST)

>the first problems occur in the IMAP part of the sources.

The problem is the code assuming sys/time.h includes time.h,
which it no longer does.  Attached is my patch from the current
Red Hat RPM's in Rawhide.

Hope this helps.

TTYL

--
Mike A. Harris                  Shipping/mailing address:
OS Systems Engineer             190 Pittsburgh Ave., Sault Ste. Marie,
Red Hat Inc.                    Ontario, Canada, P6C 5B3
http://www.redhat.com           Phone: (705)949-2136

Looking for Linux software?   http://freshmeat.net  http://www.rpmfind.net
http://filewatcher.org  http://www.coldstorage.org  http://sourceforge.net

---

From: [email-masked] (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
Date: 25 Feb 2001 12:23:03 -0500

Ivan Zakharyaschev <[email-masked]> writes:

> glibc on Linux.

Of course. Just take a look in Rawhide. 

> Probably they are going to be rather trivial (a few explicit

Yes.

-- 
Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Red Hat, Inc.

---

From: "Mike A. Harris" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 13:08:38 -0500 (EST)

>Red Hat RPM's in Rawhide.

I hate replying to my own message, however I made a
misattribution above.  It should say "the patch" not "my patch" -
a brainfart on my part..  The patch is Trond's and was taken from
our imap package.

Just wanted to correct this attribution.

TTYL

---

From: Ivan Zakharyaschev <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 01:16:46 +0300 (MSK)

Mike, Trond, thank you.

Best regards,
	Ivan Z.