Subject: [BUG] Sort criteria

From: Osman%Pine <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 18:41:43 +0200 (CEST)

Hi it's me again,

Actualy this post isn't about a BUG but about an ENHANCEMENT request.
I just did it so those developers read it, I haven't read/found any of
them here yet...

Why can't we choose to sort the messages in folders accoarding to their
MSG-ID's?

That would be a REALY GOOD option me thinks!
Think of all the people who use mailing lists...

TTYL.
-- 
                   It's not a bug, it's tradition!

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: 
 http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

---

From: Jessica Rasku <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 17:34:09 -0700 (PDT)

> Why can't we choose to sort the messages in folders accoarding to their

	What do you mean?  Straight by message ids?  Or a more complete
threading than the ``ordered subject''?  I'd like something like
``threaded'' as a sort option, but it COULD be a high processor use
feature.  The other feature, I can understand when looking for a message
by message id (as I find myself doing about once a month (if not more
often) lately), but can't we search for that?  

							Jessica

-- 
Jessica Rasku, Box 270, Rossland, B.C., V0G 1Y0, (250) 362-5701, 
LinuxBox: (250) 362-9668.

List manager: [email-masked] 
     send command help ---- To get help with majordomo
               or lists ---- To get a list of all lists on server.

WWW: <http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/Andes/8749>

---

From: Osman%Pine <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 02:44:36 +0200 (CEST)

> often) lately), but can't we search for that?  

Yes I mean threaded.
You must use their "Message-Id:" for that...
In conjuction with "In-Reply-To:" ofcourse.
And a slithly different folder listing.

TTYL.
-- 
           Intel: where Quality is job number 0.9998782345!