Subject: Re: A semi-moderated list?

From: "Aaron S. Hawley" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 22:30:01 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)

On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Michael Talbot-Wilson wrote:

> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 13:42:04 +1030 (CST)
> From: Michael Talbot-Wilson <[email-masked]>
> To: Aaron S. Hawley <[email-masked]>
> Subject: Re: A semi-moderated list?
> 
> > > > > > attack my civility.  sounds like you can't defend your laziness.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Nope.  Always was lazy.  That's why the software has to do it.
> > > > > 
> > > > ring a ding ding.  it doesn't do it though!
> > > 
> > > Yes it does.  Just a question of configuration.
> > > 
> > but guess what, it's not configured that way right now
> 
> Not my problem.

your right it's my problem.  cause i have to put up with your shit.  and
you talked about me being uncivil, when you practice the same shit.

---

From: Michael Talbot-Wilson <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 16:20:46 +1030 (CST)

> you talked about me being uncivil, when you practice the same shit.

You shouldn't have posted private mail on the list and you shouldn't
have misrepresented me by selective quoting.  If fact I thanked you,
with some surprise, for an "almost civil reply".  That is all I said
on the subject.  I meant that that mail item was far more civil than
anything you had previously sent. 

A second point of misrepresentation or misunderstanding: I meant
that configuration of the list server was a matter for the list
owner.  I didn't mean it was your problem.  I meant it is something
you need to take up with someone else, not with me.