Subject: 2nd Request: Building 4.03 on Win32

From: "J. Heinrich" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 13:01:38 -0700 (PDT)

Am I missing something obvious?

Previous versions of the source distribution included several
"makefile.wnt" files, as well as a "build.bat" for building (compiling) on
MS Windows NT/9x with Visual C++.

Does 4.03 support building on Win32?

--J

-----------------------------------------------------------------
 For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: 
 http://www.washington.edu/pine/pine-info/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

---

From: Bobby Ezell <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 13:39:26 -0700 (PDT)

In prior Pine, we had one shared folder for company-directed e-mail and
then private, individual folders for all else. The company folder was with
a common group id and permissions set to g+rw. We recently went to 4.02
and the changes in locking seems to not allow this to work (whenever
sendmail receives mail to the company folder, it changes it to g-rw).

Does anyone have a solution for sharing a folder under pine? Is there a
change to sendmail that will keep the folder both read/write for a group?

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Bobby Ezell                           E-Mail:  [email-masked]      
Technical Sales Support               V-Mail:  503-624-0360 (voice)       
Rasmussen Software, Inc.              F-Mail:  503-624-0760 (fax)       
10240 SW Nimbus Ave., Ste L9          http://www.anzio.com 
Portland, OR 97223                    http://www.anzio.com/~bezell   
-------------------------------------------------------------------
        AnzioLite and AnzioWin for all your telnet needs
       Send sales & support questions to:   [email-masked]
===================================================================

---

From: Terry Gray <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 13:58:53 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)

> Does 4.03 support building on Win32?

No; at this time only the pre-built binary is available.  

(There are a bunch of reasons... including that PC-Pine now includes
commercial/proprietary code that UW licensed for use with it, as well as
issues relating to encryption code hooks, etc...)

Was there something in particular you'd like to add/change?

-teg

---

From: "J. Heinrich" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1998 14:58:31 -0700 (PDT)

On Mon, 14 Sep 1998, Terry Gray wrote:

> commercial/proprietary code that UW licensed for use with it, 

I am truly sorry to learn that PC-Pine is no longer open source.  Apache,
Lynx and Perl somehow manage to provide Win32 compatibility in their
source distributions.

> Was there something in particular you'd like to add/change?

Just a few minor customizations, like losing X-Sender (& non-matching
envelope) when sending on behalf of a "role" account (ala
ALLOW_CHANGING_FROM in 3.96).

Mainly I'm just an open source nut who enjoys the freedom and flexibility
that comes with source code.  I generally shun binary-only packages (which
is hard to do on NT :).

--J