Subject: pgp/pine, take II

From: "Brian H. Trammell" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 17:28:25 -0500 (EST)

Greetings,

Thank you for your previous suggestions. However, I am attempting to use
PGP 5.0 with Pine, not 2.6.2. 5.0 has different calling semantics, and I
am having quite a bit of difficulty porting any of the suggested solutions
to PGP 5.0 due to these semantic differences.

I would like to instead address why pine returns >Problem filtering:
Success<...

"Success" is not generated by pgps, pgpe, or pgpv (the pgp executables for
pgp 5.0) so it looks like it's added by Pine's filter layer. But if Pine
is returning success, why does it die with "Problem filtering"...I'm
afraid I don't understand.

tia, and please cc me.

-brian

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
         brian h. trammell <[email-masked]> http://www.altara.org/~brian
                      georgia tech civil engineering system administration
                                "The problem with the rat race is that the 
                                                   winner is still a rat."
                                                                0xf00fc7c8

---

From: Fabio Coatti <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 1998 02:27:46 +0100 (MET)

> afraid I don't understand.

I modified papp to use pgp5.0 syntax, and I can send it to you, but your
problem is related to a bug in libc, I think.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Fabio Coatti
2:332/409.414                   Fidonet
[email-masked]             Internet
http://felix.unife.it/~cova     Home page
Old SysOps never die... they simply forget their password.
-----------------------------------------------------------