Subject: year 2000 compliance

From: "Gerard Grealis" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 1997 16:47:23 -0700

I would be obliged if you would provide infromation on whether the
following softwrae is year 2000 compliant....
Bulkmail version 3.6
This information is required by ICL CFM for the completion of their
project for the DOH in England
Please FAX tis information to 441719725544
and make your fax for the attention of Gerard Grealis (ICL Year 2000
coordinator)

---

From: Matt Simmons <[email-masked]>
Date: 12 Jun 1997 11:53:29 -0500

> and make your fax for the attention of Gerard Grealis (ICL Year 2000

I wonder is Gerard and his off-topic ilk are Y2k compliant.  I would
gladly endure 2.5 more years of this crap if it meant that S/N would
skyrocket on 1/1/2000.

---

From: "Robin S. Socha" <[email-masked]>
Date: 12 Jun 1997 19:25:38 +0200

>> On Thu, 12 Jun 1997 16:47:23 -0700,
>> Gerard Grealis
>> who can be reached at: [email-masked]
>> (whose comments are cited below with "Gerard> "),
>> had this to say in article <[email-masked]>
>> concerning the subject of year 2000 compliance

What is he trying to tell us? My interpretation:

Dyslexic, lobotomised, single white spammer spammer using toy os
looking for likeminded idiot for MS/SM games.

Gerard> I would be obliged if you would provide infromation on whether
Gerard> the following softwrae is year 2000 compliant....  Bulkmail
Gerard> version 3.6 This information is required by ICL CFM for the
Gerard> completion of their project for the DOH in England Please FAX
Gerard> tis information to 441719725544 and make your fax for the
Gerard> attention of Gerard Grealis (ICL Year 2000 coordinator)

Just how stupid can you get?

Robin over and out...

-- 
Robin S. Socha, M.A., Political Science Dept., Bonn University, Bonn
To get my pgp public key, send an e-mail with the subject "get pgp key"
GMC d++ s+:+ a- C++ UL++$>+++$ P+>++$ E>+ W- N+ o@ w--- M-- PS--- PE+++ Y+
PGP++>+++ t+() 5-- tv++(+) b+++ DI++ D+(++) G++>+++ e++>+++ h r++>+++ y+**

---

From: Alessandro Miotto <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 17:55:48 GMT

On the same subject, but more on topic: the value of the
last-time-prune-questioned feature in .pinerc is stored as YY.MM. Is
this Y2K compliant?

-- 
	Alessandro

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Alessandro Miotto - IT/PDP/BIS      | Tel:    +41 22 767 9576
 CERN - European Laboratory          | Fax:    +41 22 767 7155
 for Particle Physics                | E-mail: [email-masked]
 CH-1211 Geneve 23                   |

---

From: Terry Gray <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 1997 20:38:31 -0700 (PDT)

Yes, Pine is Y2K compliant.  You just need to know that in three years it
will be year 100.  We did that in anticipation of the year 10,000 problem.

-teg