Subject: More UCE from ingenue.com

From: [email-masked] (Josh Olaf)
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 21:10:10 GMT

I received the following e-mail in my inbox today.  
The person who MAY be doing this also posted to 
comp.mail.pine with the following header:

Subject:      Info???? HELP!
From:         [email-masked]
Date:         1997/01/26
Message-Id:   <[email-masked]>
Sender:       [email-masked]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-Ascii
X-M2n:        psg.com
Organization: PSGnet mail to news gate
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups:   comp.mail.pine

--

I have also recieved the following e-mail spam
from the same person in two other messages. Of
course, this is the same person.

Josh

--
#1

Received: from gold.compulink.co.uk (gold.compulink.co.uk
[194.153.1.10])
by mail10.sirius.com (8.6.12/960919) with ESMTP id JAA02880
for <[email-masked]>; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 09:10:03 -0800 
From: [email-masked]
Received: from gold.compulink.co.uk by gold.compulink.co.uk
(8.8.4/SMI-4.1) id RAA01287; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 17:00:08 GMT 
Received: ingenue.ingenue.com by XM99283-6733.com (8.7.2/8.7.1)
with
SMTP id JAA23500 for <:-)> 
Comments: Authenticated sender is [email-masked] 
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1997 15:23:16 GMT 
Subject: How do we stop this? 
Priority: urgent 
Apparently-To: <[email-masked]> 
Status: U 

Any ideas? How do we stop this shit?

Ingenue don't care man!

Complain all you like...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!

I seem to be getting a bevy of UCE from what appears to be
ingenue.com

Complaints to ingenue.com (cc [email-masked]) have had zero effect, so
I can
only assume that this ISP condones UCE.  Any ideas?

>
>The guy claims to use a mailer called MaxxAnon.
>
>In message <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
writes
>Return-Path: <[email-masked]>
>Received: from relay-5.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.1]) by aegis1.demon.co.uk
> with SMTP id <[email-masked]>
> for <[email-masked]> ; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 04:10:17 +0000
>Received: from relay-5.mail.demon.net by mailstore for [email-masked]
>          id 854235147:5:04871:0; Sat, 25 Jan 97 23:32:27 GMT
>Received: from gold.compulink.co.uk ([194.153.1.10]) by relay-5.mail.demon.net
>           id aa504822; 25 Jan 97 23:32 GMT
>Received: from gold.compulink.co.uk by gold.compulink.co.uk (8.8.4/SMI-4.1)
>       id XAA06126; Sat, 25 Jan 1997 23:30:00 GMT
>From: [email-masked]

--

#2

Received: from gold.compulink.co.uk by gold.compulink.co.uk
(8.8.4/SMI-4.1) id RAA01536; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 17:13:21 GMT 
From: [email-masked]
Received: ingenue.ingenue.com by XM99283-6733.com (8.7.2/8.7.1)
with
SMTP id JAA23500 for <:-)> 
Comments: Authenticated sender is [email-masked] 
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1997 15:23:16 GMT 
Subject: What the xxxx? 
Priority: urgent 
Apparently-To: <[email-masked]> 
Status: U 

Any ideas? How do we stop this shit?

Ingenue don't care man!

Complain all you like...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!

I seem to be getting a bevy of UCE from what appears to be
ingenue.com

Complaints to ingenue.com (cc [email-masked]) have had zero effect, so
I can
only assume that this ISP condones UCE.  Any ideas?

>
>The guy claims to use a mailer called MaxxAnon.
>
>In message <[email-masked]>, [email-masked]
writes
>Return-Path: <[email-masked]>
>Received: from relay-5.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.1]) by aegis1.demon.co.uk
> with SMTP id <[email-masked]>
> for <[email-masked]> ; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 04:10:17 +0000
>Received: from relay-5.mail.demon.net by mailstore for [email-masked]
>          id 854235147:5:04871:0; Sat, 25 Jan 97 23:32:27 GMT
>Received: from gold.compulink.co.uk ([194.153.1.10]) by relay-5.mail.demon.net
>           id aa504822; 25 Jan 97 23:32 GMT
>Received: from gold.compulink.co.uk by gold.compulink.co.uk (8.8.4/SMI-4.1)
>       id XAA06126; Sat, 25 Jan 1997 23:30:00 GMT
>From: [email-masked]
>Received: ingenue.ingenue.com by XM99283-6733.com (8.7.2/8.7.1) with SMTP id
>JAA23500 for <:-)>
>Received: by ingenue.ingenue.com (8.6.9/5.960514)
>Message-Id: <[email-masked]>
>Comments: Authenticated sender is [email-masked]
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1997 15:23:16 GMT
>Subject: Travel Insurance
>X-UIDL: ffffffffffffffffeeeeeeeddddddddd
>Priority: urgent
>Status: MC

--
Stephen Tonkin

---

From: "Robin S. Socha" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 21:10:15 +0100 (CET)

>comp.mail.pine with the following header:

[snipped GIANT, ANNOYING and UNNECCESSARY soapbox]

Now - this is a mailing list for the email program pine - right? Now here's
what the FAQ says:

  How can I filter messages into different incoming folders?
  
     Pine does not perform delivery filtering; that is the function of other
     programs, such as (on Unix hosts) "procmail" or "mailagent." For
     details on selection and configuration of such programs, see the
     Filtering Mail FAQ (by Nancy McGough) at one of the following
     locations:
     http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/hypertext/faq/usenet/mail/filtering-faq/
     faq.html
     http://www.smartpages.com/faqs/mail/filtering-faq/faq.html
     ftp://ftp.halcyon.com/pub/ii/internet/filtering_mail_faq.txt
     ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet/news.answers/mail/filtering-faq
            
The Filtering Mail FAQ would have directed to a document called:
   http://digital.net/~gandalf/spamfaq.html
which, in turn, would have directed you to:
   http://www.mv.com/users/gmcgath/selfdefense.html
and to:
   Spam cancellation notice (spam guidelines) :
   http://spam.ohww.norman.ok.us/notice.htm
and to:         
   How to get rid of Junk Mail, Spam and Telemarketers:
   http://www.csn.net/~felbel/jnkmail.html
   
but certainly not to comp.mail.pine or this mailing list. So stop whining,
get yourself procmail and read the f* netiquette, especiall the part which
tells you how to respond properly without stuffing other people's inboxes
with HUGE SOAPBOXES full of "important" content.        

Cheers,
Robin

++---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++---+---+---+---+---++---+---+---+---+---++
   Robin S. Socha	 Political Science Dept.	Tel: +49(0228)22217-8
   Bonner Talweg 56	 Bonn University		Fax: +49(0228)22217-9
   53113 Bonn		 email: [email-masked]
++---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++---+---+---+---+---++---+---+---+---+---++
       On the package it said: "Requires MS Windows 3.11 or better"  
	       			      ...  so I got myself Linux. 
++---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---++---+---+---+---+---++---+---+---+---+---++