Subject: Is "cc:" any more or less valid than "Cc:" or "CC:"?

From: Mike O'Connor <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 1996 21:52:35 GMT

I'm running into a situation where I THINK a particular MUA -- let's call
it "pine 3.91" -- emits "cc:" headers that don't get processed by the
metoo functionality of an MTA which shall be known as "smail 3.1.29".  Is
"cc:" any more or less valid than "Cc:" or "CC:" or something which
starts with a capital letter?  My reading of RFC 822 says that "cc:" is
quite valid -- is it possibly deprecated in some later RFC?  

							...Mike
--
 Michael J. O'Connor                                 Internet: [email-masked]
 InterNIC WHOIS: MJO                                 http://www.coast.net/~mjo

"The longer you wait for the mail, the less there is in it."           -Calvin