Subject: Followup-to:? Reply-to?

From: [email-masked] (Gabrielle)
Date: 5 Jun 1995 02:33:45 GMT

I would appreciate some help!

I will be crossposting a group proposal to several newsgroups,
but I need all the traffic the posts generate to go to ONE
newsgroup. How do I do this?

I have read all the PINE manuals I can find, but I only saw
reference to Reply-to: which doesn't seem appropriate. Is there
a Followup-to: header command? 

Thanks in advance!

Debbie
               \||/     [email-masked]
                @@       "The Internet is For
               (\/)          THE BIRDS!!!"
              (    ) 
               \  /  Visit Debbie, her Teddy Bears
               /||\     and her Parrots at her
              / "" \          HomePage!
              ~~~~~~ 
            http://www.rhein.de/t-b/users/debbie.html

---

From: "Zoli Fekete, keeper of hungarian-faq" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 1995 06:12:55 -0400

You've got to Setup/Config and add:
customized-hdrs        = Followup-to:
 - then you'll get that field when composing the post!

 Zoli [email-masked] (note my old full address @bcuxs2 is retired)
"For my assured failures and derelictions, I ask pardon beforehand of my
betters and my equals in my calling." - Rudyard Kipling

---

From: Debbie Kesling <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 1995 18:28:06 -0400

Thanks! I had a few other folks email me with this info,
so that is how I set it up. It seems to work fine when
I type "F" to followup my post via tin, but when I am
reading the newsgroup post with PINE, it wants to
post to ALL the newsgroups...

Sigh!

Debbie

---

From: Michael Schuyler <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 1995 15:14:23 -0700 (PDT)

By now the word is out that it is fairly easy to gain access to a shell 
from within Pine. With 3.91 you can check the enable-alternate-editor 
option and list your editor as "bash" or "csh" or whatever. Even if the 
administrator has pine.conf.fixed set up as no-enable-alternate-editor it 
still works if you can save a .pinerc file with the feature listed. The 
same is true of 3.89, even though you don't get the nice config screens. 
  Now, if you grant access to a shell anyway, this is all a moot point, 
but if you don't, it's a hole. Does anyone have any suggestions about 
this? 

      o o o o o o o . . .   _~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\_ _~LinkNet~~~~~~\_
    o      _____            |   Kitsap Regional    | |   Support     |
  .][__n_n_|DD[  ====_____  |      Library         | |'least we try! |
 >(________|__|_[_________]_|______________________|_|_______________|_
 _/oo OOOOO oo`  ooo   ooo  'o^o^o            o^o^o` 'o^o         o^o`
========================================================================
Support: (360) 405-9131 Fax:(360) 405-9128 [email-masked]
Michael Schuyler:     Voice:(360) 405-9139 [email-masked]

---

From: David L Miller <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 13:18:23 -0700 (PDT)

> post to ALL the newsgroups...

True.  Actually, I'm surprised we haven't seen more complaints about that
Pine limitation......

|\ |  |\/|  David L. Miller    [email-masked]  (206) 685-6240
|/ |_ |  |  Software Engineer, Pine Development Team   (206) 685-4045 (FAX)
University of Washington, Networks & Distributed Computing, JE-20
4545 15th Ave NE, Seattle WA 98105, USA

---

From: "Zoli Fekete, keeper of hungarian-faq" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 1995 06:12:55 -0400