Subject: test keyword for post

From: Fuzzy <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 2 May 1995 03:04:07 GMT

added organization header

*sigh* still thing we shouldnt have to edit all users files .pinerc's tho

there has to be a simpler way to get the enviroment variable ORGANZATION
picked up as the organization: header value by default, like all the 
other news posters do.

                                 fuz

---

From: David L Miller <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 2 May 1995 09:10:06 -0700 (PDT)

If you put the entry in /usr/local/lib/pine.conf, you don't need to edit
anyone's .pinerc file... 

|\ |  |\/|  David L. Miller    [email-masked]  (206) 685-6240
|/ |_ |  |  Software Engineer, Pine Development Team   (206) 685-4045 (FAX)
University of Washington, Networks & Distributed Computing, JE-20
4545 15th Ave NE, Seattle WA 98105, USA

On Tue, 2 May 1995, Fuzzy wrote:

> Date: Tue, 2 May 1995 03:04:07 GMT
> From: Fuzzy <[email-masked]>
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: test keyword for post
> 
>

---

From: Steve Hubert <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 2 May 1995 23:24:00 -0700 (PDT)

We have noted that it would sometimes be useful for some config variables
to have a system-wide list that gets added to instead of replaced when a
user changes their own version of the same variable.  We haven't had time
to think about how to do that yet but will definitely try to do something
before 3.92, I think.  Thanks.

Steve Hubert <[email-masked]>
Networks and Distributed Computing, Univ. of Washington, Seattle

---

From: Fuzzy <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 3 May 1995 09:03:34 -0400 (EDT)

On Tue, 2 May 1995, Steve Hubert wrote:

> Date: Tue, 2 May 1995 23:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Steve Hubert <[email-masked]>
> To: Fuzzy <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: test keyword for post
> 

something like pine.conf.added (like pine.conf.fixed). 

yes, thats exactly what we need for this one :). 

any projections on when 3.92 will be available?

                                     fuz

---

From: Steve Hubert <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 3 May 1995 09:30:50 -0700 (PDT)

> yes, thats exactly what we need for this one :). 

No promises that will do something that general.  There are problems with 
that approach, too.
 
> any projections on when 3.92 will be available?

No.  Not real soon now.