Subject: Pine and X400

From: Mike Dorrington <[email-masked]>
Date: 26 Apr 1995 16:25:58 GMT

Can Pine 3.91 handle X400 addressing?
=======================================================
                 /
 \             / /
  \\\' ,      / //
   \\\//,   _/ //,               Mike Dorrington
    \_-//' /  //<,               [email-masked]
      \ ///  <//`                [email-masked]
       /  >>  \\\`__/_           202 452 5002  (fax)
      /,)-~>> _\` \\\            202 452 5027 (voice)  
      (/   \\ //\\
          //  // \\\    
         ((  ((       
=======================================================

---

From: David L Miller <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 1995 11:27:35 -0700 (PDT)

Pine is an Internet mailer, not an X.400 mailer, but I have seen people
use something like "[email-masked]"... 

|\ |  |\/|  David L. Miller    [email-masked]  (206) 685-6240
|/ |_ |  |  Software Engineer, Pine Development Team   (206) 685-4045 (FAX)
University of Washington, Networks & Distributed Computing, JE-20
4545 15th Ave NE, Seattle WA 98105, USA

On 26 Apr 1995, Mike Dorrington wrote:

> Date: 26 Apr 1995 16:25:58 GMT
> From: Mike Dorrington <[email-masked]>
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: Pine and X400
>

---

From: Ed Greshko <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 29 Apr 1995 12:45:27 -0800 (GMT)

> use something like "[email-masked]"... 

	Also, if the local sendmail is part of an X.400 gateway implementation
it can handle:

	/c=us/admd=attmail/prmd=...../

> > Can Pine 3.91 handle X400 addressing?

Edward M. Greshko                       Technical Manager, Electronic Commerce
                                        Control Data Asia/Pacific Region
Voice: +886-2-715-2222 x287             6/F, 131 Nanking East Road, Section 3
FAX  : +886-2-712-9197                  Taipei, Taiwan R.O.C