Subject: Re: Fcc problem

From: the mole <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 1995 18:32:35 -0800

Wet-Sprocket:
> Comes here Mr. Mr Kevin Yeung with this opinion in the "comp.mail.pine" 
> group in this article on 31 Jan 1995 10:47:32 -0800:
>>
>> I have several entries in my addressbook whose fcc's aren't sent-mail. 
>> When I use the (C)ompose command to send a new message, the out-going mail
>> is correctly copied to the corresponding fcc.  But if I use the (R)eply
>> command to reply messages FROM these people, the out-going messages will
>> still go to sent-mail, which is not what I want.  I have to manually edit
>> the header everytime and I find this really troublesome.  Is there a way
>> to get things work (I'm using Pine 3.91)?  Or will Pine 3.92(?) checks the
>> addresses of all out-going mails, compare them with the entries in
>> addressbook and copy them to the correct folders?  Thank you.
>
>
> It works in 3.91, all you need to do is remove the default 'sent-mail'
> value to the default-fcc: option in the setup/config screen. And add
> <Empty Value> instead by A to add and hit return immediately. 
>
> But by doing this, you will not have a default-fcc for others who haven't
> graced you .addressbook. Suit yourself.
>
>
> --
> ---.                                ,    ,
> \___                                ("\''/").___..--''"`-._
>     \                                `9_ 9  )   `-.  (     ).`-.__.`)
> `___/riram NCV                       (_Y_.)'  ._   )  `._ `. ``-..-'
> Computer Svcs                      _..`--'_..-_/  /--'_.' .
> Temple Univ.                      (il).-''  ((i).'  ((!.-'
> __________________________________________________________________________

Nope. That's not it. I have the same problem. With some addresse Fcc is 
recognized with others it isn't. (That is, Fcc is properly set even when 
I take the address from the message I'm replying to, but just 
for certain addresses (Fcc is set for all addresses in my addressbook)). 

My guess is this has something to do with how Fcc: is entered in the 
addressbook.

Suggestions, anybody?

tm

P.S.: Wet-Sprocket, I had problems with your way of citing, I had to 
re-adjust the posting by hand.
--
      /               . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
__  __/   __  __     . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  the mole
   /     /   /   /  . . . . . . . . . . . .  [email-masked]
__/   __/ __/ __/  . . . . . . . . http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~markusg/

---

From: [email-masked] (Wet-Sprocket)
Date: 1 Feb 1995 01:29:11 GMT

Comes here Mr. Mr Kevin Yeung with this opinion in the "comp.mail.pine" group
in this article on 31 Jan 1995 10:47:32 -0800:

 +   I have several entries in my addressbook whose fcc's aren't sent-mail. 
 +   When I use the (C)ompose command to send a new message, the out-going mail
 +   is correctly copied to the corresponding fcc.  But if I use the (R)eply
 +   command to reply messages FROM these people, the out-going messages will
 +   still go to sent-mail, which is not what I want.  I have to manually edit
 +   the header everytime and I find this really troublesome.  Is there a way
 +   to get things work (I'm using Pine 3.91)?  Or will Pine 3.92(?) checks the
 +   addresses of all out-going mails, compare them with the entries in
 +   addressbook and copy them to the correct folders?  Thank you.

It works in 3.91, all you need to do is remove the default 'sent-mail' value
to the default-fcc: option in the setup/config screen. And add <Empty Value>
instead by A to add and hit return immediately.

---

From: Paul Ribeiro <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 1995 10:40:34 -0500 (EST)

Hi,
we use cutcp here as our main connection program and was wondering
if anyone has used the dos version of pc-pine with vanilla pktdrv
and the config.tel from cutcp? From the testing I've done, pine
can't seem to figure out how to connect to the nameserver to lookup
hostnames.
thanks,
/P