Subject: ^K cut to end of line

From: David Brownlee <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 1994 13:50:39 +0100 (BST)

Please do NOT make this part of old-growth!

	By all means make it a option, but please don't include it in
	the old-growth set!
	
	Old-growth enables extra feature, not makes changes to the user
	interface! (As I see it :)

		David

       [email-masked]. Network Analyst. Postmaster. Hostmaster.
         <_.-^-._>  Telephone: (+44) 71 477 8000 Ext:3757.  <_.-^-._>
 Snailmail:E308, City University, Northampton Sq, Islington, London EC1V 0HB.

---

From: Chris Garrigues <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 1994 09:43:11 -0600 (CST)

> 	interface! (As I see it :)

I agree with this.  I also think you should make it an option because if 
you don't, the question will keep coming up over and over and over and 
over.  I know some people there may be purists about what does or doesn't 
go into Pine, but the simple fact is that adding this as an option would 
eliminate an entire class of email on this mailing list, and as we all 
know, anything which limits the amount of email that you receive is 
good.  (Of course, we would then ask that the same 
emacs-compatibility-flag also enable the meta key. ;-)

Chris

Chris Garrigues                              (MIME capable) [email-masked]
Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation    +1 512 338 3328
3500 West Balcones Center Drive                     Fax +1 512 338 3838
Austin, TX  78759-6509          USA

---

From: Terry Gray <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 1994 07:54:37 -0800 (PST)

It would not be part of the old-growth macro set of features; it would be 
a separate feature.  This is a personal preference issue that would not 
be universally welcomed even by power users.

-teg

p.s. for those who have suggested that one simply hit return first... 
this will not work in the header.  That's the one place you can't 
simulate the emacs-style behavior via ^M^K.