Subject: re: smtp-server=

From: "James R. Kenyon" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 1994 08:10:38 -0500 (EST)

Philip Hazel's suggestion to make certain configurable fields only 
configurable at the system-wide level sounds *great* to me -- it would 
cut down on user questions here as people often get themselves into 
trouble messing around with their PC-PINE configuration (and, to a lesser 
extent, UNIX .pinerc).
-jk

>ph ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>ph From: Philip Hazel <[email-masked]>
>ph Subject: smtp-server=

>ph A suggestion to the Pine Team:

....stuff deleted........

>ph In fact, we'd appreciate a more general facility whereby we could give
>ph a list of options that users were not allowed to change. (Have I
>ph suggested this before?) As well as a general Unix system, we also have
>ph a "mail-only"  system, and currently have to hack Pine on that system to
>ph prevent users escaping via the alternate editor and printer configuration
>ph options.