# xmcd CD database file
#
# Track frame offsets:
#	150
#	19352
#	37227
#	50380
#	70135
#	80620
#	83330
#	99135
#	117635
#	141152
#
# Disc length: 2191 seconds
#
# Revision: 27
# Processed by: cddbd v1.5.1PL2 Copyright (c) Steve Scherf et al.
# Submitted via: CDex 1.51
#
DISCID=8008890a,81088d0a,84088e0a,8d08900a
DTITLE=Boston / Third Stage
DYEAR=1986
DGENRE=Rock
TTITLE0=Amanda
TTITLE1=We're Ready
TTITLE2=The Launch
TTITLE3=Cool The Engines
TTITLE4=My Destination
TTITLE5=A New World
TTITLE6=To Be A Man
TTITLE7=I Think I Like It
TTITLE8=Can'tcha Say (You Believe In Me) + Still In Love
TTITLE9=Hollyann
EXTD=Originally Released October 1986\nMFSL Gold CD Edition Released July 13, 1993\n\nAMG EXPERT REVIEW: After rushing their second album Don't Look Back, Boston took eight years to complete the album Third Stage. The long delay is even more surprising c
EXTD=onsidering that their sound didn't change at all; even though only songwriter/guitarist Tom Scholz and vocalist Brad Delp remained from the original lineup, they were the ones responsible for Boston's sound. As such, it is difficult to avoid compari
EXTD=sons with their landmark debut. Third Stage has some strong moments, especially the number one hit "Amanda" where the band blends acoustic and electric guitars to complement the layered vocals. However, the songs are not as strong as those on their 
EXTD=debut, and the album is marred by the presence of instrumental fillers and an attempt to cling to a theme of "journey through life's third stage." Thus, rather than focusing on universal topics such as the exuberance and uncertainties associated wit
EXTD=h youth, the mature lyrics are lost on most of their young rock audience. Given the time between albums and the changes in the pop landscape, it was a little disappointing to find Boston stuck in the same sound. The album still sounds great when it 
EXTD=works on all cylinders ("We're Ready," "Cool the Engines"), but the album is not filled with enough satisfying moments. This may be nostalgic pop rock of the '80s, but casual listeners should start with their debut. -- Vik Iyengar\n\nAmazon.com Cust
EXTD=omer Review\n4.5 stars - Boston's comeback, March 25, 2005 \nReviewer: Darth Kommissar (Las Vegas, NV (USA))\nIn the mid-late seventies, Boston fast became one of the most popular classic rock groups of the day. Their 1976 debut album held the recor
EXTD=d for the best-selling debut album of all time (the record wouldn't be broken for many years), and their follow-up album, 1978's Don't Look Back, was also well-received. And then, Boston faded away. The musical mastery of guitar genius Tom Scholz an
EXTD=d the awesome vocals of Brad Delp became forgotten, amidst a sea of hair metal and new wave. The fact that they hadn't released an album in years didn't help things either. But little did people know, the band was working on a new record. By the tim
EXTD=e Third Stage hit stores in 1986, it was a project EIGHT YEARS in the making. Many legal issues, as well as Tom Scholz's perfectionistic production style, caused the delay. How does the band's comeback measure up? Read on for my review of Third Stag
EXTD=e. \n\nUltimately, Third Stage was a good album. The band's third record features that forgotten classic rock sound they had used earlier, but at the same time throws just enough new elements into the mix that it sounded fresh, even in the eighties 
EXTD=when bands were attempting innovations around every corner. The band scored a huge charting hit with the classic Amanda. The song continues to get plenty of classic rock airplay, even to this day, and it remains this album's most popular song. But l
EXTD=ike with most albums, there are a plethora of underrated songs that are not to be missed. The classic power rock of songs like We're Ready and Cool The Engines will certainly appeal to those who enjoyed the group's classic albums. There are also som
EXTD=e excellent, melodic rockers, including Hollyann and Can'tcha See - both of which are excellent songs that never got the proper credit. Admittingly, I don't particuarly think this album was worth an eight year weight (that's not to say it's not a go
EXTD=od album), but most of that weight was due to legal troubles, so I can't really blame the band there. This isn't my favorite Boston album (I'll always like the debut best), but it's very close to the top. No fan of the group should be without it. \n
EXTD=\nBoston's albums really need to be remastered and rereleased. They were only released on CD once, and these older issues are fading away and becoming tough to find in stores. Only the band's greatest hits compilation seems to be readily available. 
EXTD=Since these records are so good yet so unavailable, they are in desperate need of reissuing. \n\nThird Stage is a damn good album from start to finish. Tom Scholz is often criticized for being somewhat of a perfectionistic producer (one of the big d
EXTD=elay-causers between Boston albums), but ultimately his taking so long to produce this one paid off - it sounds great. Following 1978, an unofficial Boston tradition started - ten years between each studio album. This meant that they didn't release 
EXTD=a follow-up to Third Stage until 1994! This means Boston albums are a rarity, but when they come out, they're great (most of them.) New to the band? Start with the band's self-titled debut and get every album in order (they don't have many albums, s
EXTD=o it's worth it to buy them all.) Third Stage is a great addition to the catalogue, but newbies should start at the beginning.\n\nAmazon.com Customer Review\nGuilty pleasure, October 31, 2000 \nReviewer: Brian Rubendall (Oakton, VA) \nBy the mid 198
EXTD=0s, most of the 70s arena rock bands (Foreigner, Journey, Styx, Kansas, etc.) had called it a day. Then along comes Boston's ever unpredictable Tom Shultz to reemerge from wilderness with his band's third album to breathe a little life into the genr
EXTD=e. Listening to the album, one would have no idea that in the eleven years since Boston's first album became a smash success that punk, the new wave and music videos had revolutionized rock, managing to alter the formulas of even such dinosuars as Y
EXTD=es and ZZ Top. Instead, here comes Shultz with such 1975 FM radio ready fare as "Amanda," "We're Ready" and "Cool the Engines." And some of us, at least, discovered that we were not to cool to take a trip down memory lane after all.\n\nAmazon.com Cu
EXTD=stomer Review\nTom's first use of synthesised sounds, October 7, 2005 \nWhy does Tom Scholz brag in "Third Stage"'s liner notes that he doesn't use synthesisers? When Tom recorded these songs, he used his guitar as a synthesiser. Synthesised sounds 
EXTD=are all over this record from start to finish. Tom made his guitar sound like a frigging violin for gods sake. And he thinks thats not a synthesised sound? \n\nNow, on to the music. If you've worn out your copy of "Don't Look Back" or the debut, Thi
EXTD=rd Stage is practically interchangable with those two records; multi octave tenor vocals, layers of heavilly reverbed guitars, and lots of fancy studio wizardry all around. \n\nAnd lets not forget the incredible amount of synthesisers Mr. Scholz use
EXTD=d. Sure he SAYS there were no synthesisers used, but we all know better than that. This record is LOADED with synthesised sounds. When the listener hears a violin that is actually a guitar, than that is a synthesised sound, weather Tom wants to admi
EXTD=t it or not. So yes Tom, your record DOES use synthesisers. Only in your case they're modified guitars as opposed to keyboards.\n\nAmazon.com Customer Review\nNot The Old Boston - 2.5 stars, July 14, 2005 \nReviewer: New Kiddintoun (Someplace Elsewh
EXTD=ere)\nNOTICE: If you do not have this record, do not buy it without finishing reading this review. \n\nTHIRD STAGE is not near as good a record as the band's previous two (DON'T LOOK BACK and BOSTON). The main reason for this is more than likely tha
EXTD=t the band is gone. Brad Delp (mainly lead and harmony vocals) and Tom Scholtz (mainly guitar) were the only band members left at that point, leaving Boston in a dark spot; Tom Scholtz covered most of the music (shining a light on his almost overly-
EXTD=apparent talent), but he overdid it - far too many overdubs (even for Boston) were added, and more than 80% of the record's drums are recreated through keyboards (drum simulators, if you may). There is hardly any natural sound; the acoustic twelve-s
EXTD=tring guitars are essential to the album. Without them, this album would be blow-dried, air-conditioned claustrophobia wrapped into a circle.......in other words, a record. \n\nTHIRD STAGE gets an overall 3 stars from me, the result of disappointmen
EXTD=t and a reverse effect: certain things can 'grow on you' over time, but this seemed to 'grow off me' over time. It might seem great when you buy it, but that will change. \n\nDO NOT EXPECT THE BOSTON FROM THE 70'S - YOUR EXPECTATIONS WILL FAIL YOU! 
EXTD=\n\nAmazon.com Customer Review\nThe Great Comeback, June 27, 2005 \nReviewer: erictheb "erictheb" (Boston)\n1986 was the year of two major comebacks from two totally different musical beasts- The Monkees and Boston. While The Monkees resurgance was 
EXTD=spurred by endless airing of their old show on MTV, Boston's was built on a foundation of 7 years of great anticipation and hope that they someday would return, from the millions of people who had become fans of the band's melodic hard rock. \n\nBas
EXTD=ed on the perfectionist ways of Tom Scholz's production and guitar skills, and the multi-layered harmonies of Brad Delp's soaring vocals, Boston had come virtually out of no where in 1976 to define a genre- AOR- with one of the biggest-selling debut
EXTD=s ever. This debut set the standard for rock production at the time. \n\nThey were also known as being part of the wave of American "faceless corporate rock" with bands like Styx, Foreigner, Kansas, Toto, and REO Speedwagon. Hey, if great melodic gu
EXTD=itar-based music is what you want to call faceless and corporate, fine. Just because it wasn't punk, California soft rock, singer/songwriter or New Wave doesn't mean it was invalid. \n\nFollowed up in 1978 by the rushed if still attractiv Don't Look
EXTD= Back- an album that honorably aped their debut- Boston toured into 1979 then took a break. \n\n1980 saw the release of guitarist Barry Goudreau's solo album which was really a Boston album in all but name, lacking only Sholz's production and guitar
EXTD=. In the meantime, Scholz and CBS locked heads in court, CBS demanding an album, Scholz claiming CBS was forcing him to release unworthy and unfinished material, as well as holding back on royalties as punishment. \n\nWhen finally settled, Scholz se
EXTD=t about signing a new record deal with MCA and finally releasing the 3rd Boston album, appropriately titled Third Stage. This album has some great songs on it- the tender #1 ballad Amanda is extremely beautiful; #9 hit We're Ready and Cool The Engin
EXTD=es are good rockers with rocket ride imagery; I Think I Like It and #20 Cantcha Say are decent pop rock; and Holly Ann is a wistful, nostalgic look back for Scholz to his youth in the peace and love 60s. \n\nBut this album is not without its flaws. 
EXTD=As other reviewers have mentioned, this (and the first 2 albums as well) really needs a remaster. I would also do a re-mix. The production is a victim of its mid-80s vintage as well as Scholz's blind faith in 80s technology. The sound is a bit cold,
EXTD= drenched in echo. Even if the debut album itself has a certain sterile perfection, it still sounds much warmer than Third Stage. The 80s electronic drums should be replaced by the real deal. And Brad Delp's voice should be brought more to the fore.
EXTD= The liner notes should also be updated, and maybe some unreleased tracks added. \n\nLead by the Amanda single, Third Stage shot to number one and sold millions, and Boston would go on an extremely succesful arena tour with only Delp and Scholz left
EXTD= from the original band. I had the pleasure of seeing them on their home turf in 1988 at a benefit show at the old Boston Garden, and it was a blast. Even got to meet Brad and Tom by the artist entrance in the back of the Garden after the show, and 
EXTD=they were really cool. As a 19 year old college sophomore heavily into classic rock and WZLX at the time, it blew my mind to actually stand face-to-face and meet the guys behind this great music. Boston, thanks for the memories!\n\nAmazon.com Custom
EXTD=er Review\nIt took 6 years to write the same song twice?!?, April 22, 2005\nReviewer: Greg Brady "columbusboy" (Capital City) \nThe worst tragedy of this album isn't so much that it's resolutely awful. I've certainly heard worse albums. It's that cl
EXTD=early Tom Scholz believes he's made a significant artistic statement. \n\nHe proudly boasts (twice!) that "it took nearly six years to conceive and complete this album" (in his home studio in his garage). He spends a full page of the liners explaini
EXTD=ng exactly how it was recorded (all-analog), with what instruments (he goes so far as to tell you type of pickup on the guitars), what effects ("No those aren't violins, they're electric guitars through a Rockman") and when he wrote them (he was scr
EXTD=ounging as far back as 1972 for material). There's another full page of acknowledgements. If that doesn't convince you of Scholz's self-importance, how about lectures on vegetarianism and animal rights? It's easier to forgive a little conceit when i
EXTD=t's backed up with great art, but that's in little evidence here. \n\nHIGHLIGHTS: \n"Amanda", the album's only hit, was a deserved one. It's a catchy well-produced hummable ballad. Outside of that, the only other one that really made me take notice 
EXTD=was rocker "Cool the Engines". \n\nLOWS: \n"My Destination" is completely derivative of "Amanda". Compare them and tell me they're not the same song with different lyrics. (And you can't get away with telling me it's a "reprise" as part of a concept
EXTD= album. You don't change lyrics on a reprise. This is Scholz trying to pull a fast one.) "The Launch" was an overblown attempt at creating the sound of a "liftoff" as a pre-amble to "Cool the Engines". It doesn't work. It's nowhere near as great a l
EXTD=ead-in as "Foreplay" was for "Long Time". "Hollyann" is a self-congratulatory backslap to aging hippies.("Hollyann/We made the dark into the light/We saw the wrong and the right/We were for life/And we would never concede it") It leaves a bad taste 
EXTD=in your mouth. \n\nBOTTOM LINE: \nThe songs are mostly faceless. I hope during the 6 years Scholz spent in the garage he was able to find time to tuneup the vehicles and clean up the room in general. If not, he pretty much has nothing to show for al
EXTD=l that time.\n\nAmazon.com Customer Review\nScholz's Last Masterpiece, November 5, 2004\nReviewer: Gregory S. Standard (Manassas, Va United States)\nMost Boston fans would agree that Scholz takes much too long to put out an album - 8 years on averag
EXTD=e. However, if it were not for this fact, Boston's Third Stage (released in 1986) would probably not have been the great album that it is. Here's my reasoning: \n\nTom Scholz's song writing ability was probably depleted by the beginning of the 1980'
EXTD=s. Most of the songs on the Third Stage album were conceived of during Tom's "period of creativity", which spanned the entire decade of the 70's. For example, Amanda was really an old song, first conceived of in late 1978. Likewise, most of the song
EXTD=s from the debut album were written years before their release date as well. \n\nTherefore, although the album was a "modern" 1986 work of art, it still sounded a lot like the "old" Boston of the 70's. The only thing that changed at all was the elec
EXTD=tronic tone of Tom's guitar (still the best sound in electric guitar history). Of course, we'll ignore the fact that the only other original member of the band that was left was Brad Delp. \n\nSo, what we have are old songs that took eight years to 
EXTD=record. This is a good thing, because once Scholz starting writing material in the mid 1980's, it is clear that he had tapped out his well of musical creativity. \n\nJust look at the Walk On CD (his last gasp) and the latest Corporate America CD (mo
EXTD=stly written by other people). \n\nI look at Third Stage as the final sequel to a great Trilogy. Good things seem to come in threes. \n\nIt's a shame it had to end there, even though Scholz's "Boston" is still alive and kicking. \n\nI guess original
EXTD= members like guitarist Barry Goudreau were pretty important after all, eh Tom? \n\nFor those who would like to hear an example of the importance of the original members, check out Barry Goudreau's solo album from 1980 "Barry Goudreau", which featur
EXTD=es the entire Boston line up, minus Tom Scholz and see if you think Tom was the "sole" creative force behind Boston. \n\nHalf.com Details \nProducer: Tom Scholz \n\nAlbum Notes\nBoston: Brad Delp (vocals); Tom Scholz (acoustic & electric guitars, pi
EXTD=ano, organ, bass, drums).\nAdditional personnel: Gary Pihl (guitar); Jim Masdea (drums, percussion).\n\nDuring the eight-year hiatus between DON'T LOOK BACK, Boston's sophomore release, and 1986's THIRD STAGE, every member left the band, save guitar
EXTD=ist/leader Tom Scholz and singer Brad Delp. And while many other '70s rock monsters struggled to stay afloat in the '80s, Boston had no problem making the transition. THIRD STAGE was another big hit, powered by the Top-10 power ballad "Amanda." \nBo
EXTD=ston doesn't stray from its classic sound here. THIRD STAGE standouts such as "We're Ready," "Cool the Engines," and "Hollyann" pick up right where DON'T LOOK BACK left off. Fans hoping that they wouldn't have to wait as long for their next Boston f
EXTD=ix were let down again. It would be another eight years before 1994's WALK ON hit the racks. YEAR: 1986
EXTT0=
EXTT1=
EXTT2=
EXTT3=
EXTT4=
EXTT5=
EXTT6=
EXTT7=
EXTT8=
EXTT9=
PLAYORDER=
